ADC Fires Back At INEC, Insists On Congresses, Convention
The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has issued a strong rebuttal to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) following remarks made by its chairman, Professor Joash Amupitan, during an interview with ARISE News.
INEC
had warned that the ADC’s planned congresses and convention could violate
existing court orders, but the party dismissed this as a misrepresentation of
judicial directives and an overreach of the commission’s constitutional role.
In a statement released by its National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, the ADC accused INEC of distorting the Court of Appeal’s preservation order, which directed parties to maintain the status quo.
The ADC
argued that the order was meant to prevent irreversible changes to the subject
of litigation, not to suspend the internal democratic processes of political
parties. It emphasized that no explicit prohibition against holding congresses
or conventions exists, and that INEC’s interpretation amounted to contempt of
court.
The party
further criticized INEC for conflating its monitoring role with the authority
to determine the validity of internal party processes.
According
to the ADC, this effectively placed the commission above the law, granting
itself veto powers it does not possess. The ADC maintained that internal
disputes within the party do not suspend constitutional rights, and that INEC’s
responsibility is to remain neutral while allowing due process to unfold.
Rejecting
comparisons with past cases such as Zamfara, the ADC insisted that its
situation was distinct, as it had not violated any legal requirements. It
reaffirmed its constitutional right to organize congresses and hold a national
convention, declaring its intention to proceed with these activities in full
compliance with the law.
The party
urged INEC to confine itself strictly to its statutory mandate and avoid
interfering with lawful party governance.
This
confrontation underscores the growing tension between INEC and opposition
parties, with the ADC framing the dispute as a broader struggle over the
freedom of political organizations to function without undue interference
No comments:
Post a Comment