The Northern Equation and Nigeria’s Political Future: A Deep Dive with Hon. Abdulmumin Jibrin
In a riveting one-on-one interview on Channels Television’s PoliticsToday, Hon. Abdulmumin Jibrin, former House of Representatives member and Chair of the House Committee on Housing and Habitat, offered a candid, layered perspective on the state of Nigeria’s politics, the dynamics within the North, and the trajectory of President Bola Tinubu’s administration.
Jibrin
began by dispelling the notion that he had been politically dormant, asserting
that his engagement has remained consistent, albeit more strategic. He
addressed the speculation surrounding Rabiu Kwankwaso’s potential defection to
the APC, emphasizing that while discussions remain open, vested interests
within Kano’s APC, particularly those with gubernatorial ambitions, may be
resisting the merger. Jibrin advocated for a government of national unity,
stressing that political stability in Kano is essential for national cohesion.
The
conversation pivoted to the broader northern political landscape, where Jibrin
passionately challenged the narrative that the North has been shortchanged in
power rotation. He argued that since independence in 1960, the North has held
power for approximately 39 years, compared to the South’s 28. He criticized the
tendency to count from 1999, calling it a historical erasure that insults past
northern leaders. This framing, he warned, fuels a false sense of
marginalization and undermines unity.
Jibrin’s
most striking commentary came when he dissected the myth of northern unity. He
lamented that the North has historically “united against itself,” citing
examples from Gowon to Atiku Abubakar, where internal sabotage eclipsed
regional solidarity. He called for introspection among northern elites, urging
them to stop the cycle of internal destruction and instead harness the region’s
vast resources, fertile land, minerals, and population, for development.
On
President Tinubu, Jibrin was unequivocal in his support. He described Tinubu as
mentally sound and strategically astute, asserting that the president has laid
a solid economic foundation by halting domestic borrowing and stabilizing the
economy. He dismissed criticisms that blame Tinubu for Nigeria’s longstanding
challenges, arguing that it is unfair to hold a two-year administration
accountable for decades of systemic decay.
However,
the interview did not shy away from controversy. Jibrin addressed the growing
calls for Vice President Kashim Shettima’s replacement ahead of 2027. He warned
that such a move would reopen divisive debates around religious balance and
regional representation, potentially destabilizing the APC’s internal
structure. He urged the president to resist such pressures, framing Shettima as
a “committee of one” capable of delivering results.
Yet,
despite the depth of the discussion, several perspectives were conspicuously
absent. The interview lacked voices from civil society, youth movements, and
marginalized communities who bear the brunt of Nigeria’s economic and security
crises. There was little interrogation of how Tinubu’s reforms tangibly affect
everyday Nigerians, beyond macroeconomic indicators. The conversation also
sidestepped the role of media accountability and the need for institutional
reforms to ensure transparency and justice.
To move
forward, Nigeria must embrace a multi-stakeholder dialogue that includes not
just political heavyweights but also grassroots voices. The North must confront
its internal fractures and invest in human capital, education, and
infrastructure. Political actors should prioritize inclusive governance over
power consolidation. And while Jibrin’s optimism about Tinubu’s leadership is
notable, it must be matched with measurable outcomes that improve lives, not
just rhetoric.
Ultimately,
the interview was a masterclass in political realism, but the path to national
renewal demands more than strategic alliances, it requires moral courage,
institutional integrity, and a collective commitment to equity.
No comments:
Post a Comment