Trump Orders US Withdrawal From 66 Global Organisations

Trump Orders US Withdrawal From 66 Global Organisations

On January 8, 2026, President Donald Trump issued a sweeping directive ordering the United States to withdraw from sixty-six international organisations. The announcement, carried by Channels Television, marks one of the most extensive disengagements from multilateral institutions in modern history.

The decision reflects Trump’s long-standing skepticism toward global governance structures, which he has often criticized as undermining U.S. sovereignty and draining national resources.

According to the report, the withdrawal list spans a wide range of organisations, including those focused on health, trade, security, environment, and humanitarian affairs. While the full list was published in the article, the broader implication is clear: Washington is signaling a decisive shift away from international cooperation toward a more unilateral approach.

The move has generated intense debate both domestically and internationally. Supporters argue that many of these organisations impose obligations that disadvantage the United States economically or politically, and that withdrawal will allow the country to reclaim autonomy in decision-making.

Critics, however, warn that such a mass exit could weaken America’s global influence, disrupt collaborative efforts on issues like climate change and public health, and embolden rival powers to fill the vacuum.

Observers note that this action is consistent with Trump’s earlier policies, including his withdrawal from the World Health Organization during his first term and his skepticism toward NATO’s collective defense framework.

However, the scale of this latest directive is unprecedented, encompassing dozens of institutions that have historically shaped global norms and cooperation.

The announcement has already prompted responses from foreign governments and international bodies, many of which expressed concern about the potential erosion of multilateralism.

Analysts suggest that the coming months will reveal whether the U.S. intends to replace these memberships with bilateral agreements or pursue a more isolationist stance.

The withdrawal from sixty-six global organisations represents a dramatic reorientation of U.S. foreign policy under Trump. It underscores his administration’s commitment to redefining America’s role in the world, prioritizing sovereignty and national interest over collective international frameworks.