Tribalism and Religion Are The major Obstacles We Face When Addressing Insecurity - Darlington Umoru

Tribalism and Religion as Core Barriers to National Security - Insights from Darlington Umoru

In a compelling public address that has sparked widespread reflection across Nigeria’s sociopolitical landscape, Darlington Umoru, a prominent commentator on national affairs, asserted that tribalism and religion remain the most formidable obstacles in the country’s fight against insecurity.

His statement, delivered during a widely circulated media engagement, underscores the deep-rooted divisions that continue to hinder collective efforts toward peace and stability.

Umoru emphasized that Nigeria’s diversity, while potentially a source of strength, has been weaponized through tribal and religious allegiances that fracture national unity. He argued that insecurity in Nigeria, manifested through terrorism, banditry, communal clashes, and political violence, is exacerbated by the inability of citizens and leaders to transcend ethnic and religious boundaries.

 According to him, these divisions not only fuel distrust among communities but also obstruct the formulation and implementation of inclusive security policies.

The speaker called for a paradigm shift in how Nigerians perceive identity and belonging. He urged citizens to embrace a national consciousness that prioritizes unity over sectarian interests. Umoru’s message resonated with many, especially in light of Nigeria’s history of ethno-religious conflicts, including the Boko Haram insurgency, herder-farmer clashes, and political marginalization based on tribal affiliations.

His remarks align with broader academic and policy discussions. A comparative study published by the ACU Journal of Humanities draws parallels between tribalism and religious disharmony in ancient Israel and contemporary Nigeria, highlighting how these forces have historically undermined governance and social cohesion.

The study suggests that understanding tribal dynamics from historical contexts can offer frameworks for mitigating modern-day divisions.

Furthermore, Sahara Weekly’s analysis of Nigeria’s sociopolitical challenges echoes Umoru’s concerns. The publication notes that religion, often manipulated by political actors, has become a tool for division rather than unity.

It cites examples of electoral controversies, communal violence, and the politicization of religious institutions as evidence of how faith-based identities are leveraged for power rather than peace.

Umoru’s call to action is clear: Nigeria must confront the twin specters of tribalism and religious bias if it is to make meaningful progress in securing its people.

This requires not only policy reforms but also a cultural reawakening, one that fosters empathy, inclusivity, and a shared vision for the future.